This is actually a pretty good example of traddy bullsh*t. Of course, it's Feeneyite (i.e. pre-Vatican II) bullsh*t rather than Lefebvrite or "sedevacantist". But the huge effort they've put into denying a perfectly orthodox theological opinion (i.e. baptism by blood) is directly comparable to sedevacantist attacks on the doctrine of the Church's indefectability, or indeed the more improbable complaints of Peter Kwasniewski about the liturgical "reforms" of the 1960s. (Bugnini is to blame for the decline in Christian marriage, supposedly.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What is the difference between the legal and theological definitions of ownership?
English law of course makes a distinction between ownership and possession. In English law, ownership is the right of exclusive use and enjo...
No comments:
Post a Comment